Peep Beep!

Peep Beep! (the clock that rings when they peep in!) is a blog dedicated to privacy and information law. #law #privacy #dataprotection #AI #informationsecurity. Interested in contributing? Email peepbeepteam at gmail dot com.

Menu

Skip to content
  • Home
  • About us
  • Events
  • Privacy
    • Cookie Notice

Tag Archives: metadata

Access to data / consent / content data / Data protection / Data retention / metadata / Privacy

The proposed ePrivacy Regulation: When the EC converses with the CJEU…

Posted on January 12, 2017 by Sophie Stalla-Bourdillon • 4 Comments

So, 2017 is full of promises! One of them is the proposed ePrivacy Regulation (officially, ‘Regulation on Privacy and Electronic Communications’) that the European Commission (EC) has suggested should replace the existing, old fashioned ePrivacy Directive (Directive 2002/58/EC on Privacy and Electronic Communications). The proposed ePrivacy Regulation – which would represent a signficant evolution in … Continue reading →

Share this:

  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print

Like this:

Like Loading...
anonymisation / big data / Data protection / General Data Protection Regulation / Internet intermediaries / metadata / pseudonymisation / Risk-based approach / Surveillance

Mind the Caveats – CJEU Advocate General opines that Dynamic IP Addresses can be Personal Data … (sometimes)

Posted on June 17, 2016 by Alison Knight • 1 Comment

“I am not a number …” – but to what extent does EU data protection law deem that I am identifiable from one if someone somewhere could link it back to me at a single point in time? The Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) has been hearing arguments in a case involving the … Continue reading →

Share this:

  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print

Like this:

Like Loading...
anonymisation / big data / Data protection / General Data Protection Regulation / Geo-location data / Personal data / Privacy / Privacy impact assessment / pseudonymisation

Location Data and Making Sense of the Goldilocks Paradox of Legal Anonymisation (too much, too little or just right…?)

Posted on May 24, 2016 by Alison Knight • Leave a comment

Collect, delete, repeat …. From ‘Where I am’ to ‘Who I am’, and back again? To pick up the thread from my previous posts on the topic of location data here and here, this final piece in the set returns to the first theme I discussed. This relates to the legal debate over when location … Continue reading →

Share this:

  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print

Like this:

Like Loading...
Data protection / ICO / metadata / Personal data

ICO issues guidance on when and how to remove personal data “safely” from disclosable information to avoid breaching data protection rules

Posted on November 2, 2015 by Alison Knight • 1 Comment

To be identifiable or not to be identifiable – to what extent do our identities merit concealment through law in light of the capabilities of modern technologies? The UK Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has recently published guidance on what to do when handling requests for information in respect of which personal data must first be … Continue reading →

Share this:

  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print

Like this:

Like Loading...
Data protection / Internet intermediaries / metadata

Access request for network data granted! A few thoughts on the decision of the Australian Privacy Commissioner in Ben Grubb and Telstra (1 May 2015)

Posted on May 21, 2015 by Sophie Stalla-Bourdillon • 1 Comment

Ben Grubb and Telstra Corporation Limited [2015] AICmr 35 is a fascinating decision – issued on 1 May 2015 by Timothy Pilgrim, the Australian Privacy Commissioner – especially in the light of our recent posts, such as this one concerning Internet Service Providers (ISPs) and their roles as mere conduits and/or data controllers, or that … Continue reading →

Share this:

  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print

Like this:

Like Loading...
Data protection / Internet intermediaries / safe harbour / Surveillance

On surveillance, safe harbour and Schrems…Are we that stuck?

Posted on April 16, 2015 by Sophie Stalla-Bourdillon • 2 Comments

Readers of this blog will almost certainly be aware that the European Union (EU) was the first regional organisation on the international stage to adopt a comprehensive, and relatively stringent, data protection regime. Yet, as the Internet is a global communications infrastructure, the EU has had to find ways to dialogue with non-EU (‘third’) countries … Continue reading →

Share this:

  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print

Like this:

Like Loading...
Intelligence and security agencies / interception

Two Parliamentary reports give unique insight into the operations of the UK intelligence services, while advocating for overhaul of “piecemeal and “unnecessarily complicated” surveillance rules

Posted on March 23, 2015 by Alison Knight • 3 Comments

Call for more transparency in UK surveillance legal regime accompanied by revelations regarding the existence of ‘bulk personal datasets’ Two important reports were presented to Parliament in March. They represent a landmark in terms of the level of transparency they provide surrounding the activities of the UK intelligence and security agencies. The reports are: The … Continue reading →

Share this:

  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print

Like this:

Like Loading...
Data retention / Internet intermediaries

Counter-Terrorism and Security Act 2015 receives UK Royal Assent

Posted on February 19, 2015 by Alison Knight • 1 Comment

Confirmed (albeit temporary) expansion in data retention powers to add new cyber-clue pieces to identity-profile ‘jigsaws’ The Counter-Terrorism and Security Act 2015 was enacted on 12 February 2015, following agreement by both Houses of Parliament on the text of the Bill (discussed on this blog here and here). The Act contains a number of tough … Continue reading →

Share this:

  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print

Like this:

Like Loading...
Consumer data

Competition authority probes commercial usage of consumer data

Posted on January 30, 2015 by Alison Knight • Leave a comment

Competition Law and Privacy Protection – A Regulatory Match Made in Heaven for Online Data Issues? There have been recent headlines touting privacy as the new competition law, with one US commentator opining that “the role that antitrust played in the wake of the Industrial Revolution is being captured by privacy in the Digital Age”. … Continue reading →

Share this:

  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print

Like this:

Like Loading...
Access to data / content data / Data protection / interception / Internet intermediaries / Law enforcement / metadata / Privacy

What if Commissioners could be heard by the right people? Why DRIPA is getting muddier and muddier…

Posted on January 29, 2015 by Sophie Stalla-Bourdillon • 2 Comments

Just before Christmas, the UK Interception of Communications Commissioner’s Office (IOCCO) published online its submission for the Investigatory Powers Review. It is a 51 p. document full of interesting things. The purpose of this post is to highlight the main points made by the IOCCO with a view to clarifying the debate as regards the … Continue reading →

Share this:

  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Post navigation

← Older posts

Peep Beep! The clock that rings when they peep in!

Peep Beep! team

  • 1 Alison Knight
    • EU Article 29 Working Party consults on draft guidance on automated decision-making and profiling
    • Questions on UK bulk communications data capabilities referred to the EU Court of Justice
    • Governments push on with Cybersecurity Law and Policy Initiatives – an Overview so far in 2017
  • 1 Henry Pearce
    • CJEU Advocate General opines on the definition of a data controller, applicable national law, and jurisdiction under data protection law
  • 1 Sophie Stalla-Bourdillon
    • Decoding Russmedia: did the CJEU just see red… and mess it up? 
    • On Pancakes, Paper Pudding, and the Draft Digital Omnibus: What Happens Next?
    • AI and the UK DPDI Bill: moving backward
  • 1 sullivc
    • D5 – The Start of a Global Digital Network? by Dr Clare Sullivan
    • Pointing the Finger – Recent US Decisions on Access to Mobile Phone Data
    • International E- Citizenship by Dr Clare Sullivan

Follow Blog via Email

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Topics

Create a website or blog at WordPress.com
Peep Beep!
Proudly powered by WordPress Theme: Sight.
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d